PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
13.06M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Positive revenue growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
0.00%
Positive gross profit growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
0.00%
Positive EBIT growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
0.00%
Positive operating income growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-0.00%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
1.16%
Positive EPS growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1.16%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.02%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 253.81%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-42.02%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 30.23%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-76.79%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-32.81%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-32.81%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-24.45%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
54.36%
Below 50% of 0819.HK's 160.15%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
54.36%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
34.04%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
We expand SG&A while 0819.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.