0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
13.06M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.33%
Positive revenue growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
2.33%
Positive gross profit growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
104.53%
Positive EBIT growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
104.53%
Positive operating income growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
46.08%
Positive net income growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
45.88%
Positive EPS growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
45.88%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
218.47%
OCF growth under 50% of 0819.HK's 539.82%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
217.89%
FCF growth above 1.5x 0819.HK's 75.38%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-70.33%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 253.81%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-70.33%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 30.23%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-43.82%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
178.67%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
178.67%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-60.50%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
87.70%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0819.HK's 160.15%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
87.70%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
89.51%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.29%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.