PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.91M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Positive revenue growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-285.03%
Negative EBIT growth while 0819.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-114.93%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-114.93%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
135.43%
Share count expansion well above 0819.HK's 18.63%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
135.43%
Diluted share count expanding well above 0819.HK's 18.63%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.21%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 61.55%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-12.15%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 61.55%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
60.03%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to 0819.HK's 61.55%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
65.71%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-108.61%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
74.18%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
165.46%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 15.82% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
138.12%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 15.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
243.43%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 15.82%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
344.28%
We expand SG&A while 0819.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.