PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.91M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
16.70%
Positive revenue growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
15.77%
Positive gross profit growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
105.96%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x 0819.HK's 78.83%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
105.96%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x 0819.HK's 78.83%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
322.84%
Positive net income growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
330.00%
Positive EPS growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
344.83%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-1.33%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-5.02%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
120.51%
Positive OCF growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
276.82%
Positive FCF growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
87778.82%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 770.29%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
13.18%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0819.HK's 433.51%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
40.90%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0819.HK's 139.82%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
4300.92%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
1020.89%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
4574.68%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
660.42%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-48.70%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-43.92%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
538.69%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 112.62%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
104.48%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 44.10%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.11%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 8.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
46.46%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while 0819.HK cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
3.48%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. 0819.HK's 49.92%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
21.91%
Inventory growth well above 0819.HK's 9.48%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.59%
Asset growth well under 50% of 0819.HK's 13.64%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
18.28%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 0819.HK's 0.53%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-0.26%
We’re deleveraging while 0819.HK stands at 38.53%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
314.74%
We increase R&D while 0819.HK cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
4.92%
SG&A growth well above 0819.HK's 3.56%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.