PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
26.24%
Positive revenue growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
9.27%
Positive gross profit growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-4.45%
Negative EBIT growth while 0819.HK is at 25.68%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-4.45%
Negative operating income growth while 0819.HK is at 25.68%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
23.51%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x 0819.HK's 16.57%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
21.43%
EPS growth above 1.5x 0819.HK's 13.33%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
21.43%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 0819.HK's 13.33%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
1.69%
Share count expansion well above 0819.HK's 2.45%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.59%
Diluted share count expanding well above 0819.HK's 2.61%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.78%
Positive OCF growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
25.16%
Positive FCF growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
21014.84%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 1053.34%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
24.65%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0819.HK's 217.82%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-3.39%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 48.55%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-9466.85%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 897.06%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-5313.50%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0819.HK is at 259.62%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-1349.92%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 74.20%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
23.83%
Below 50% of 0819.HK's 248.43%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-22.39%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0819.HK is 22.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
13.82%
Below 50% of 0819.HK's 363.51%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.36%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 59.24%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
40.98%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 14.06%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
93.73%
Below 50% of 0819.HK's 448.56%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
84.64%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 39.67%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
47.11%
Our AR growth while 0819.HK is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-21.61%
Inventory is declining while 0819.HK stands at 19.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
22.34%
Asset growth above 1.5x 0819.HK's 8.46%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.73%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 0819.HK's 1.72%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
1816.96%
Debt growth far above 0819.HK's 18.59%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
80.16%
We increase R&D while 0819.HK cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
47.97%
We expand SG&A while 0819.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.