Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)

Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.

Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.

Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.

Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.

Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.

Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.

Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.

Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.

Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 1454.36%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.

Negative 5Y CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 191.34%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.

Negative 3Y CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 119.84%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.

Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 7482.36%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.

Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0819.HK is at 297.83%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.

Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 5.13%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.

Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0819.HK is at 289.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.

Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0819.HK is 1134.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.

Negative 3Y CAGR while 0819.HK is 51.14%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.

Below 50% of 0819.HK's 83.62%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.

Below 50% of 0819.HK's 66.16%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.

Cut dividends over 10 years while 0819.HK stands at 578.36%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.

Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 522.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.

Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.

Inventory growth well above 0819.HK's 41.30%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.

Negative asset growth while 0819.HK invests at 14.78%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.

Under 50% of 0819.HK's 11.51%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.

Debt growth far above 0819.HK's 32.99%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.

Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.

Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.