0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
31.66%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 0819.HK's 5.02%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
24.43%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 0819.HK's 53.08%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-226.33%
Negative EBIT growth while 0819.HK is at 109.78%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-226.33%
Negative operating income growth while 0819.HK is at 109.78%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-3875.78%
Negative net income growth while 0819.HK stands at 82.24%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-3833.33%
Negative EPS growth while 0819.HK is at 82.69%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-3833.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0819.HK is at 82.69%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
1.06%
Slight or no buybacks while 0819.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.66%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while 0819.HK cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-11.97%
Negative OCF growth while 0819.HK is at 13.99%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-11.76%
Negative FCF growth while 0819.HK is at 41.87%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-14.04%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 1545.30%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
10.91%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0819.HK's 171.68%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-11.76%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 70.72%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-2249.52%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 8611.54%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-932.93%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
6.00%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
16.65%
Below 50% of 0819.HK's 615.44%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-645.85%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0819.HK is 401.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-245.29%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0819.HK is 139.67%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
445.96%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 253.20%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
28.11%
Below 50% of 0819.HK's 143.02%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-0.65%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0819.HK is at 72.17%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-91.76%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 0819.HK stands at 193.61%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
82.29%
Our AR growth while 0819.HK is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
0.89%
We show growth while 0819.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
30.20%
Positive asset growth while 0819.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-8.39%
We have a declining book value while 0819.HK shows 22.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
50.09%
We have some new debt while 0819.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
435.21%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. 0819.HK's 27.85%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
11.64%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 0819.HK's 23.49%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.