Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)

Negative revenue growth while 0819.HK stands at 8.80%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.

Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.

Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.

Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.

Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.

Share count expansion well above 0819.HK's 0.73%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.

Diluted share count expanding well above 0819.HK's 0.24%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.

Dividend reduction while 0819.HK stands at 147.56%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.

Negative OCF growth while 0819.HK is at 107.72%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.

Negative FCF growth while 0819.HK is at 227.03%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.

Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 1054.09%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.

Negative 5Y CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 190.96%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.

Negative 3Y CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 98.83%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.

Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 5916.98%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.

Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0819.HK is at 62.07%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.

Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 201.02%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.

Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0819.HK is at 362.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.

Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0819.HK is 200.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.

Negative 3Y CAGR while 0819.HK is 90.18%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.

Below 50% of 0819.HK's 300.42%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.

Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0819.HK is at 134.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.

Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0819.HK is at 73.10%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.

Cut dividends over 10 years while 0819.HK stands at 543.23%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.

Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.

Negative near-term dividend growth while 0819.HK invests at 10.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.

Inventory growth well above 0819.HK's 16.97%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.

Asset growth well under 50% of 0819.HK's 21.50%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.

We have a declining book value while 0819.HK shows 7.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.

Debt growth far above 0819.HK's 56.14%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.

Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.

Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.