PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-13.40%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-37.16%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-160.18%
Negative EBIT growth while 0819.HK is at 10.14%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-160.18%
Negative operating income growth while 0819.HK is at 10.14%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-2470.86%
Negative net income growth while 0819.HK stands at 18.88%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-2340.00%
Negative EPS growth while 0819.HK is at 17.86%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-2611.11%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0819.HK is at 20.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
8.64%
Share count expansion well above 0819.HK's 0.08%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.01%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-3.94%
Dividend reduction while 0819.HK stands at 4.39%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
6.72%
Positive OCF growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
8.02%
Positive FCF growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-50.96%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 507.21%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-59.12%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 172.92%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-37.20%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 56.94%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-369.96%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
8.30%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
36.01%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-175.70%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0819.HK is at 107.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-159.50%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0819.HK is 72.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-1528.07%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0819.HK is 27.76%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
63.91%
Below 50% of 0819.HK's 376.88%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-16.92%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0819.HK is at 223.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-22.64%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0819.HK is at 134.06%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
64.08%
Below 50% of 0819.HK's 306.19%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
-75.82%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 54.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-33.71%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0819.HK invests at 49.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
1.80%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. 0819.HK's 69.59%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-26.93%
Inventory is declining while 0819.HK stands at 37.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
11.24%
Asset growth at 50-75% of 0819.HK's 21.06%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
-11.94%
We have a declining book value while 0819.HK shows 3.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
77.55%
Debt growth far above 0819.HK's 77.32%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-34.23%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-10.18%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.