PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.720.05 (7.46%)
0.67 - 0.72
0.33 - 0.86
15.11M / 4.44M (Avg.)
36.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.44%
Revenue growth under 50% of 3606.HK's 9.67%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
1.98%
Positive gross profit growth while 3606.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-0.35%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-0.35%
Negative operating income growth while 3606.HK is at 9.26%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
2991.74%
Net income growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 1.97%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
2880.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 2.63%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
2860.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 2.63%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.27%
Share change of 0.27% while 3606.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 3606.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
100.00%
OCF growth of 100.00% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
100.00%
FCF growth 50-75% of 3606.HK's 137.31%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
-66.05%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 130.42%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-69.39%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 89.98%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-49.38%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 63.86%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-100.00%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
100.00%
Positive OCF/share growth while 3606.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
100.00%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 3606.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
36.90%
Below 50% of 3606.HK's 136.04%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
125.08%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 3606.HK's 247.61%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
1534.11%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 3606.HK's 254.49%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
19.37%
Below 50% of 3606.HK's 205.08%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-6.83%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 3606.HK is at 58.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-3.85%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 3606.HK is at 31.11%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-100.00%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
14.65%
AR growth of 14.65% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-19.50%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
3.10%
Similar asset growth to 3606.HK's 3.13%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
2.88%
Under 50% of 3606.HK's 6.89%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
83.53%
We have some new debt while 3606.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
18.55%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. 3606.HK's 7.58%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-5.63%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.