0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
13.06M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-30.74%
Negative revenue growth while 3606.HK stands at 32.68%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-30.74%
Negative gross profit growth while 3606.HK is at 57.54%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
67.30%
EBIT growth similar to 3606.HK's 67.45%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
67.30%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of 3606.HK's 104.87%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
49.84%
Net income growth under 50% of 3606.HK's 127.50%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
49.69%
EPS growth under 50% of 3606.HK's 113.77%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
49.69%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of 3606.HK's 113.77%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-116.41%
Negative OCF growth while 3606.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-116.64%
Negative FCF growth while 3606.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-63.43%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-63.43%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-63.43%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
67.31%
OCF/share CAGR of 67.31% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
67.31%
OCF/share CAGR of 67.31% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
67.31%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 67.31% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
56.93%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 56.93% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
56.93%
Net income/share CAGR of 56.93% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
56.93%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 56.93% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.99%
We cut SG&A while 3606.HK invests at 35.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.