0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
13.06M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth under 50% of 3606.HK's 30.60%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
0.00%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 3606.HK's 19.93%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
0.00%
EBIT growth below 50% of 3606.HK's 6.84%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
0.00%
Operating income growth under 50% of 3606.HK's 33.66%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.23%
EPS growth under 50% of 3606.HK's 29.82%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
1.23%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of 3606.HK's 29.82%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.85%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-26.85%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-41.44%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
34.62%
OCF/share CAGR of 34.62% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
34.62%
OCF/share CAGR of 34.62% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-22.52%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
13.86%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 13.86% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
13.86%
Net income/share CAGR of 13.86% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
-148.98%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 3606.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.