PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth under 50% of 3606.HK's 6.06%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
0.00%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 3606.HK's 8.33%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
0.00%
Positive EBIT growth while 3606.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
0.00%
Positive operating income growth while 3606.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-0.00%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
1.16%
Positive EPS growth while 3606.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1.16%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 3606.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.02%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-42.02%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-76.79%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-32.81%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-32.81%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 3606.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-24.45%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
54.36%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 54.36% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
54.36%
Net income/share CAGR of 54.36% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
34.04%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 34.04% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 3606.HK's 58.08%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.