PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.91M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Positive revenue growth while 3606.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
0.00%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 3606.HK's 1.85%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
0.00%
EBIT growth below 50% of 3606.HK's 10.12%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
-0.00%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-512.90%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-512.90%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-71.49%
Share reduction while 3606.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-71.49%
Reduced diluted shares while 3606.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
212.35%
10Y CAGR of 212.35% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
25.02%
5Y CAGR of 25.02% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
327.01%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 3606.HK's 115.39%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-1.34%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
5.04%
OCF/share CAGR of 5.04% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-55.00%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-18.02%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 3606.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-70.56%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 3606.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-37.01%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 3606.HK is 29.38%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.81%
We cut SG&A while 3606.HK invests at 59.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.