Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)

Negative revenue growth while 3606.HK stands at 12.42%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.

Negative gross profit growth while 3606.HK is at 12.64%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.

Negative EBIT growth while 3606.HK is at 73.27%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.

Negative operating income growth while 3606.HK is at 111.13%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.

Negative net income growth while 3606.HK stands at 132.13%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.

Negative EPS growth while 3606.HK is at 131.82%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.

Negative diluted EPS growth while 3606.HK is at 131.82%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.

Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.

Reduced diluted shares while 3606.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Negative OCF growth while 3606.HK is at 30.87%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.

Negative FCF growth while 3606.HK is at 102.89%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.

Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 177.36%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.

Negative 5Y CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 42.44%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.

Negative 3Y CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 27.01%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.

Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.

Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 3606.HK is at 35.14%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.

Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 13.09%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.

Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 3606.HK is at 324.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.

Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 3606.HK is 127.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.

Negative 3Y CAGR while 3606.HK is 64.52%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 3606.HK is at 120.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.

Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 3606.HK is at 1.36%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.

Below 50% of 3606.HK's 368.37%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.

AR growth well above 3606.HK's 7.73%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.

Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.

Debt growth far above 3606.HK's 16.21%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.