Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)

Negative revenue growth while 3606.HK stands at 8.52%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.

Negative gross profit growth while 3606.HK is at 0.26%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.

Negative net income growth while 3606.HK stands at 48.43%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.

Negative EPS growth while 3606.HK is at 50.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.

Negative diluted EPS growth while 3606.HK is at 50.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.

Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.

Reduced diluted shares while 3606.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Negative OCF growth while 3606.HK is at 79.03%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.

Negative FCF growth while 3606.HK is at 1099.18%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.

Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 198.73%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.

Negative 5Y CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 28.89%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.

Negative 3Y CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 33.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.

Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.

Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 3606.HK is at 0.54%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.

Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 49.06%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.

Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 3606.HK is at 533.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.

Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 3606.HK is 23.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.

Negative 3Y CAGR while 3606.HK is 2.75%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.

Below 50% of 3606.HK's 99.06%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.

3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of 3606.HK's 23.48%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.

Cut dividends over 10 years while 3606.HK stands at 2633.67%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.

Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 45.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.

Negative near-term dividend growth while 3606.HK invests at 30.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.

Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.

Negative asset growth while 3606.HK invests at 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.

Debt growth far above 3606.HK's 0.67%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.