Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)

Negative revenue growth while 3606.HK stands at 2.30%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.

Negative gross profit growth while 3606.HK is at 2.37%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.

Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.

Negative operating income growth while 3606.HK is at 2.67%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.

Negative net income growth while 3606.HK stands at 6.87%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.

Negative EPS growth while 3606.HK is at 5.88%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.

Negative diluted EPS growth while 3606.HK is at 5.88%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.

Share change of 5.84% while 3606.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.

Diluted share change of 5.85% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.

Dividend reduction while 3606.HK stands at 1216.65%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.

Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 88.97%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.

Negative 5Y CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 43.74%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.

Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.

Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 3606.HK is at 66.65%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.

Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 1.02%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.

Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 3606.HK is at 81.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.

Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 3606.HK is 3.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.

Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.

Below 50% of 3606.HK's 255.76%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.

Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 3606.HK is at 53.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.

Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.

Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.

Inventory growth well above 3606.HK's 4.17%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.

Negative asset growth while 3606.HK invests at 11.02%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.

75-90% of 3606.HK's 10.77%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.

Debt growth far above 3606.HK's 3.51%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.

R&D growth drastically higher vs. 3606.HK's 0.18%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.