PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.680.04 (-5.56%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
17.22M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-19.48%
Negative revenue growth while 3606.HK stands at 13.14%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-23.42%
Negative gross profit growth while 3606.HK is at 19.19%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-78.76%
Negative EBIT growth while 3606.HK is at 82.25%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-78.76%
Negative operating income growth while 3606.HK is at 98.89%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-98.53%
Negative net income growth while 3606.HK stands at 110.14%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-98.40%
Negative EPS growth while 3606.HK is at 111.43%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-98.40%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 3606.HK is at 111.43%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.03%
Slight or no buybacks while 3606.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.00%
Slight or no buyback while 3606.HK is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
457531.89%
Dividend growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 4336.68%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
40.99%
OCF growth under 50% of 3606.HK's 87.78%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
40.27%
FCF growth under 50% of 3606.HK's 246.04%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-67.49%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 104.86%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-15.33%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 43.82%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-28.41%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 96.26%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-1697.85%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 51.78%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-72.92%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 3606.HK is at 12.31%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
34.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 3606.HK's 202.48%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-98.53%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 3606.HK is at 222.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-96.55%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 3606.HK is 41.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
100.61%
Below 50% of 3606.HK's 270.54%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
38.18%
Below 50% of 3606.HK's 221.48%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
39.20%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of 3606.HK's 45.81%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
20.11%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 3606.HK's 36.47%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-19.39%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 3606.HK stands at 132.77%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-55.55%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 62.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.54%
Firm’s AR is declining while 3606.HK shows 15.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-10.88%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
1.46%
Asset growth well under 50% of 3606.HK's 3.16%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
0.69%
Positive BV/share change while 3606.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-2.75%
We’re deleveraging while 3606.HK stands at 15.74%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-3.46%
Our R&D shrinks while 3606.HK invests at 8.68%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-13.08%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.