PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.99%
Revenue growth similar to 3606.HK's 6.15%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
52.56%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 6.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
90.29%
Positive EBIT growth while 3606.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
90.29%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 16.34%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
1343.52%
Net income growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 16.56%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
1220.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 18.37%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
1240.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 18.37%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.83%
Slight or no buybacks while 3606.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-0.00%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.60%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
13.50%
Positive OCF growth while 3606.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
11.76%
FCF growth 75-90% of 3606.HK's 14.00%. Bill Ackman might push for improved capital allocation or operational changes to match the competitor.
-62.99%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 132.60%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-62.26%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 75.74%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-48.38%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 43.91%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-373.36%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 195.27%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-31.73%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 3606.HK is at 62.04%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
37.34%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 3606.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
9.63%
Below 50% of 3606.HK's 97.31%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-44.38%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 3606.HK is 68.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-87.71%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 3606.HK is 61.84%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
25.71%
Below 50% of 3606.HK's 205.59%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-17.40%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 3606.HK is at 49.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
21.45%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 3606.HK's 37.53%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.32%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while 3606.HK cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-4.88%
Firm’s AR is declining while 3606.HK shows 4.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-27.62%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-4.57%
Negative asset growth while 3606.HK invests at 0.18%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.89%
Under 50% of 3606.HK's 6.04%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
4.18%
We have some new debt while 3606.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
47.15%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. 3606.HK's 15.23%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
51.97%
We expand SG&A while 3606.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.