PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
13.06M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth near Auto - Parts median of 0.00%. Charlie Munger might attribute this to overall industry trends.
0.00%
Gross profit growth of 0.00% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
0.00%
EBIT growth of 0.00% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
-0.00%
Negative operating income growth while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-0.00%
Negative net income growth while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
0.77%
EPS growth of 0.77% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
0.77%
Diluted EPS growth of 0.77% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
149.84%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 21.11%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
149.84%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 21.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
149.84%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 16.91%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-6.72%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-6.72%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-6.72%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
30.80%
Net income/share CAGR of 30.80% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
30.80%
Positive 5Y CAGR while Auto - Parts median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a notable advantage vs. peers struggling to grow net income/share.
30.80%
Positive 3Y CAGR while Auto - Parts median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a big short-term advantage vs. peers struggling with profit declines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.25%
SG&A growth far above Auto - Parts median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.