0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
13.79M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth near Auto - Parts median of 0.00%. Charlie Munger might attribute this to overall industry trends.
0.00%
Gross profit growth of 0.00% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
0.00%
EBIT growth of 0.00% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
0.00%
Operating income growth of 0.00% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.23%
EPS growth of 1.23% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
1.23%
Diluted EPS growth of 1.23% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.85%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 45.95%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-26.85%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 16.88%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-41.44%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
34.62%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 5.16% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
34.62%
OCF/share CAGR of 34.62% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-22.52%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
13.86%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 3.45% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
13.86%
Net income/share CAGR of 13.86% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
-148.98%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.