PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.91M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth below 50% of Auto - Parts median of 0.42%. Jim Chanos would be concerned about potential secular decline.
0.00%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
0.00%
EBIT growth of 0.00% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
0.00%
Operating income growth of 0.00% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
-0.00%
Negative net income growth while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
1.16%
EPS growth of 1.16% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
1.16%
Diluted EPS growth of 1.16% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.02%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 24.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-42.02%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-76.79%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-32.81%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-32.81%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-24.45%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
54.36%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 2.04% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
54.36%
Net income/share CAGR of 54.36% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
34.04%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 34.04% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
SG&A growth of 0.00% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.