PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.91M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth of 0.00% vs. zero growth in Auto - Parts. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
0.00%
Gross profit growth below 50% of Auto - Parts median of 0.00%. Jim Chanos would suspect fundamental margin deterioration.
0.01%
EBIT growth of 0.01% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
0.00%
Operating income growth of 0.00% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
OCF growth of 0.00% while Auto - Parts is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
0.00%
FCF growth of 0.00% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-40.67%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 19.78%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-52.50%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-43.82%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 9.43%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
257.34%
OCF/share CAGR of 257.34% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
394.87%
OCF/share CAGR of 394.87% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-60.50%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
75.39%
Net income/share CAGR of 75.39% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
28.87%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 15.24%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
85.67%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 28.15%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
SG&A growth of 0.00% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.