0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
13.79M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth of 0.00% vs. zero growth in Auto - Parts. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
0.00%
Gross profit growth of 0.00% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
0.00%
EBIT growth of 0.00% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
-0.00%
Negative operating income growth while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-512.90%
Negative EPS growth while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-512.90%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-71.49%
Share reduction while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-71.49%
Diluted share reduction while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
212.35%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 24.88%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
25.02%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 12.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
327.01%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 13.53%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-1.34%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
5.04%
OCF/share CAGR of 5.04% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-55.00%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 4.97%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-18.02%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Auto - Parts median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-70.56%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-37.01%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 14.45%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.81%
SG&A decline while Auto - Parts grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.