PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
13.06M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.69%
Revenue growth of 8.69% vs. zero growth in Auto - Parts. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
27.08%
Positive gross profit growth while Auto - Parts median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
-3.63%
Negative EBIT growth while Auto - Parts median is -5.06%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-26.39%
Negative operating income growth while Auto - Parts median is -1.17%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
3008.70%
Positive net income growth while Auto - Parts median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
2827.27%
Positive EPS growth while Auto - Parts median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
2827.27%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Auto - Parts median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
3.02%
Share change of 3.02% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
3.02%
Diluted share change of 3.02% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-52.42%
Dividend cuts while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
2536.42%
OCF growth of 2536.42% while Auto - Parts is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
1701.27%
FCF growth of 1701.27% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
53271.44%
10Y CAGR of 53271.44% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
189.85%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 1.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
-15.26%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 31.42%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
5898.47%
OCF/share CAGR of 5898.47% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
2081.08%
OCF/share CAGR of 2081.08% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
604.15%
3Y OCF/share growth of 604.15% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
300.18%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 63.34% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
-7.74%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 46.24%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-35.85%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 106.26%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
245.28%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.11%
Dividend reductions while Auto - Parts median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-100.00%
AR shrinking while Auto - Parts median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
1.95%
Inventory growth of 1.95% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
23.69%
We expand assets while Auto - Parts is negative. Peter Lynch sees a possible advantage if expansions align with profitable markets or a recovering cycle.
-1.08%
Negative BV/share change while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-35.87%
Debt is shrinking while Auto - Parts median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-100.00%
R&D dropping while Auto - Parts median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
34.88%
SG&A growth of 34.88% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.