PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
39.61%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 0.09%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
17.91%
Gross profit growth of 17.91% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
66.33%
Positive EBIT growth while Auto - Parts median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
66.33%
Operating income growth of 66.33% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
-47.50%
Negative net income growth while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-11.19%
Negative EPS growth while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-47.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-40.81%
Share reduction while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
33.34%
OCF growth of 33.34% while Auto - Parts is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
22.09%
FCF growth of 22.09% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
30.51%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Auto - Parts median of 77.79%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
-1.91%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 16.95%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
16.37%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 10.32%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-267.39%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 36.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-307.51%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
34.33%
3Y OCF/share growth of 34.33% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
135.80%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Auto - Parts median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm that management’s capital allocation strategy drives the outperformance.
97.13%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 9.02%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
-59.63%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 12.50%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
418.24%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 72.87% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
52.20%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 33.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
23.32%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Auto - Parts median. Mohnish Pabrai credits disciplined capital allocation for short-term outperformance.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.76%
AR growth of 2.76% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-3.93%
Decreasing inventory while Auto - Parts is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
5.51%
Asset growth of 5.51% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
69.47%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Auto - Parts median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-22.54%
Debt is shrinking while Auto - Parts median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
97.36%
R&D growth of 97.36% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
9.83%
SG&A growth of 9.83% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.