PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
13.06M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-13.40%
Negative revenue growth while Auto - Parts median is 1.51%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-37.16%
Negative gross profit growth while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-160.18%
Negative EBIT growth while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-160.18%
Negative operating income growth while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-2470.86%
Negative net income growth while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-2340.00%
Negative EPS growth while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-2611.11%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
8.64%
Share change of 8.64% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-0.01%
Diluted share reduction while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-3.94%
Dividend cuts while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
6.72%
OCF growth of 6.72% while Auto - Parts is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
8.02%
FCF growth of 8.02% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-50.96%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 27.30%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-59.12%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 7.44%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-37.20%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 4.87%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-369.96%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
8.30%
OCF/share CAGR of 8.30% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
36.01%
3Y OCF/share growth of 36.01% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-175.70%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Auto - Parts median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-159.50%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Auto - Parts median is -26.63%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-1528.07%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
63.91%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 40.96% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
-16.92%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Auto - Parts median is 16.26%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-22.64%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Auto - Parts median is 9.46%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
64.08%
Dividend/share CAGR of 64.08% while Auto - Parts is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
-75.82%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-33.71%
Dividend reductions while Auto - Parts median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
1.80%
AR growth of 1.80% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-26.93%
Decreasing inventory while Auto - Parts is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
11.24%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 0.15%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-11.94%
Negative BV/share change while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
77.55%
Debt growth of 77.55% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-34.23%
R&D dropping while Auto - Parts median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-10.18%
SG&A decline while Auto - Parts grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.