PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-19.48%
Negative revenue growth while Auto - Parts median is 3.05%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-23.42%
Negative gross profit growth while Auto - Parts median is 4.31%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-78.76%
Negative EBIT growth while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-78.76%
Negative operating income growth while Auto - Parts median is 5.63%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-98.53%
Negative net income growth while Auto - Parts median is 4.59%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-98.40%
Negative EPS growth while Auto - Parts median is 5.17%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-98.40%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Auto - Parts median is 5.04%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.03%
Share change of 0.03% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.00%
Diluted share change of 0.00% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
457531.89%
Dividend growth of 457531.89% while Auto - Parts median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
40.99%
OCF growth exceeding 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 2.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see if a superior business model or cost structure drives strong cash generation.
40.27%
FCF growth exceeding 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 2.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see if high profitability or prudent capex drives outperformance.
-67.49%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 33.95%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-15.33%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 14.59%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-28.41%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 48.40%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-1697.85%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-72.92%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
34.00%
3Y OCF/share growth of 34.00% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-98.53%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Auto - Parts median of 15.97%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-96.55%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Auto - Parts median is -5.81%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
100.61%
3Y net income/share CAGR near Auto - Parts median. Charlie Munger sees standard sector-level performance in the last few years.
38.18%
Equity/share CAGR near Auto - Parts median. Charlie Munger could view it as standard for the sector’s long-term capital usage.
39.20%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 16.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
20.11%
3Y equity/share CAGR 75-90% of Auto - Parts median. John Neff calls for overhead or margin tweaks to keep pace with peers.
-19.39%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-55.55%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.54%
AR shrinking while Auto - Parts median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-10.88%
Decreasing inventory while Auto - Parts is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
1.46%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x Auto - Parts median. Mohnish Pabrai sees if expansions are strategic and well-supported by end demand.
0.69%
Below 50% of Auto - Parts median. Jim Chanos suspects deeper issues blocking net worth accumulation.
-2.75%
Debt is shrinking while Auto - Parts median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-3.46%
R&D dropping while Auto - Parts median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-13.08%
SG&A decline while Auto - Parts grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.