PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
13.06M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.44%
Revenue growth 75-90% of Auto - Parts median of 1.74%. John Neff would look for catalysts to surpass sector growth.
1.98%
Gross profit growth near Auto - Parts median of 1.98%. Charlie Munger would expect typical industry cost structures.
-0.35%
Negative EBIT growth while Auto - Parts median is -1.67%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-0.35%
Negative operating income growth while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
2991.74%
Positive net income growth while Auto - Parts median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
2880.00%
Positive EPS growth while Auto - Parts median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
2860.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Auto - Parts median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
0.27%
Share change of 0.27% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-0.00%
Diluted share reduction while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
100.00%
OCF growth of 100.00% while Auto - Parts is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
100.00%
FCF growth of 100.00% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-66.05%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 27.90%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-69.39%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 19.48%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-49.38%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 20.94%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
100.00%
OCF/share CAGR of 100.00% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
100.00%
3Y OCF/share growth of 100.00% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
36.90%
Net income/share CAGR of 36.90% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
125.08%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Auto - Parts median of 30.89%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
1534.11%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 1534.11% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
19.37%
Equity/share CAGR 50-75% of Auto - Parts median. Guy Spier sees subpar expansion vs. peers’ net worth growth.
-6.83%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Auto - Parts median is 25.47%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-3.85%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Auto - Parts median is 13.70%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Auto - Parts median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-100.00%
Dividend reductions while Auto - Parts median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
14.65%
AR growth of 14.65% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-19.50%
Decreasing inventory while Auto - Parts is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
3.10%
Asset growth of 3.10% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
2.88%
BV/share growth of 2.88% while Auto - Parts is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
83.53%
Slightly rising debt while Auto - Parts median is deleveraging. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm lags behind peers in risk control or invests in more expansions.
18.55%
R&D growth of 18.55% while Auto - Parts median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-5.63%
SG&A decline while Auto - Parts grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.