0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
39.05%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.13%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
12.90%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.28%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
-9.94%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-81.41%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 6.31%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
251.72%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 6.05%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
251.20%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 5.45%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
251.20%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 5.07%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1004.54%
Dividend growth of 1004.54% while Consumer Cyclical median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-119.58%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 25.16%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-155.91%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 36.81%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
22933.94%
10Y CAGR of 22933.94% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
77546.68%
5Y CAGR of 77546.68% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
20989.01%
3Y CAGR of 20989.01% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
-275.97%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-577.90%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-831.50%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
234.41%
Net income/share CAGR of 234.41% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
1192.37%
Net income/share CAGR of 1192.37% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
74.43%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 74.43% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.02%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Cyclical is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
26.81%
Asset growth of 26.81% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-7.19%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
31.29%
Debt growth of 31.29% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.29%
SG&A growth of 8.29% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.