PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-14.52%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.50%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-5.64%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.16%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-43.49%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-40.57%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-82.23%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-80.89%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-82.21%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-7.43%
Share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
0.01%
Diluted share change of 0.01% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
364.22%
OCF growth of 364.22% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
237.08%
FCF growth of 237.08% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
75929.25%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 23.33%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
33.05%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 21.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
4.30%
3Y revenue/share growth below 50% of Consumer Cyclical median of 15.58%. Jim Chanos would suspect a significant short-term erosion in competitiveness.
2432.89%
OCF/share CAGR of 2432.89% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-19.33%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
78.77%
3Y OCF/share growth of 78.77% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
170.51%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 45.47% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
118.16%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 66.25%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
158.20%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 21.90%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
240.50%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 14.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
102.05%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 15.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-100.00%
Dividend reductions while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.56%
Inventory growth of 72.56% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-2.91%
Assets shrink while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
9.36%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
24.71%
Debt growth of 24.71% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-71.23%
R&D dropping while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
1.54%
SG&A growth of 1.54% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.