PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
26.24%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.10%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
9.27%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.18%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
-4.45%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-4.45%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.01%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
23.51%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.36%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
21.43%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.54%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
21.43%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.12%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
1.69%
Share change of 1.69% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
1.59%
Diluted share change of 1.59% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.78%
OCF growth of 19.78% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
25.16%
FCF growth of 25.16% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
21014.84%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 15.05%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
24.65%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 14.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
-3.39%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 7.53%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-9466.85%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-5313.50%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-1349.92%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
23.83%
Net income/share CAGR near Consumer Cyclical median. Charlie Munger might see typical industry-level profit expansion over 10 years.
-22.39%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.20%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
13.82%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 6.33%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.36%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 3.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
40.98%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 5.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
93.73%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 93.73% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
84.64%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 84.64% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
47.11%
AR growth of 47.11% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-21.61%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Cyclical is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
22.34%
Asset growth of 22.34% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
4.73%
BV/share growth of 4.73% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
1816.96%
Debt growth of 1816.96% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
80.16%
R&D growth of 80.16% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
47.97%
SG&A growth of 47.97% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.