PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.54%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.40%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
-15.02%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.17%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-30.53%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-30.53%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
2.50%
Net income growth of 2.50% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
0.99%
EPS growth of 0.99% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-4.19%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
1.44%
Share change of 1.44% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
7.00%
Diluted share change of 7.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.94%
OCF growth of 39.94% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
37.76%
FCF growth of 37.76% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
247.66%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 19.47%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
19.94%
5Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 16.57%. Mohnish Pabrai might attribute the outperformance to scale or brand strength.
-10.19%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 9.76%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-6520.63%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-394.38%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-261.16%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
17.38%
Net income/share CAGR 50-75% of Consumer Cyclical median. Guy Spier would see lagging competitiveness in core profitability.
27.23%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Consumer Cyclical median. Mohnish Pabrai would check that top-line growth and share count management both contribute.
59.09%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 16.19%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.28%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 4.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
6.65%
3Y equity/share CAGR 75-90% of Consumer Cyclical median. John Neff calls for overhead or margin tweaks to keep pace with peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
578.71%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 578.71% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
120.50%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 120.50% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
44.39%
AR growth of 44.39% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-44.69%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Cyclical is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
14.57%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.30%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
2.88%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
206.46%
Debt growth of 206.46% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-36.19%
R&D dropping while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-4.02%
SG&A decline while Consumer Cyclical grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.