PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-13.14%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.03%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-13.81%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
0.61%
EBIT growth of 0.61% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
0.61%
Operating income growth of 0.61% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
27.53%
Net income growth of 27.53% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
-44.39%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
3.34%
Diluted EPS growth of 3.34% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
129.62%
Share change of 129.62% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
23.43%
Diluted share change of 23.43% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
114.48%
OCF growth of 114.48% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
79.98%
FCF growth of 79.98% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
31.83%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 26.62%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if consistent reinvestment or product expansions drive this gap.
-55.08%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 18.85%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-50.53%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 9.78%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
305.97%
OCF/share CAGR of 305.97% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-9.31%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-66.91%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-34.65%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Consumer Cyclical median of 49.74%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-33.96%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 22.28%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
110.85%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 19.17%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.30%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 19.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-32.09%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 11.44%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.41%
AR shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
83.57%
Inventory growth of 83.57% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-17.48%
Assets shrink while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-51.38%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.57%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-83.12%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-18.82%
R&D dropping while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-17.25%
SG&A decline while Consumer Cyclical grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.