PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.70 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
15.11M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.81%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.33%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-20.70%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.81%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-93.78%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-93.78%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-52.25%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-41.23%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-51.99%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-18.65%
Share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.28%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-759.79%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-409.50%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-44.67%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 24.33%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-61.60%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 16.85%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-57.14%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 9.70%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-248.64%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-1024.04%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-303.16%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-78.89%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Consumer Cyclical median of 51.30%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-57.34%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 23.17%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-26.08%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 19.12%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.74%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 11.51%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-19.59%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 8.76%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
27.51%
Dividend/share CAGR of 27.51% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
81.33%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 81.33% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
65.59%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 65.59% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
45.51%
AR growth of 45.51% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-23.96%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Cyclical is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
6.27%
Asset growth of 6.27% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
22.10%
BV/share growth of 22.10% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
89.98%
Debt growth of 89.98% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-34.95%
R&D dropping while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
7.22%
SG&A growth of 7.22% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.