Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)

Negative revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.81%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.

Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.33%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.

Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.

Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.

Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.

Share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.

Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Negative OCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.

Negative FCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.

Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 42.82%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.

Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 17.05%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.

Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 12.41%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.

Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.

Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.

Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.

Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Consumer Cyclical median of 55.75%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.

Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 12.12%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.

Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 5.31%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.

Dividend declines over 10 years while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.

Dividend cuts or stagnation while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.

Dividend reductions while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.

AR shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.

Inventory growth of 23.92% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.

Assets shrink while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.

Debt growth of 38.08% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.