PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
31.66%
Revenue growth of 31.66% vs. zero growth in Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
24.43%
Gross profit growth of 24.43% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
-226.33%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -3.72%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-226.33%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -3.42%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-3875.78%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -10.17%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-3833.33%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -8.89%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-3833.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -8.91%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
1.06%
Share change of 1.06% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.66%
Dividend growth of 15.66% while Consumer Cyclical median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-11.97%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-11.76%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-14.04%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 31.80%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
10.91%
5Y revenue/share growth near Consumer Cyclical median of 10.90%. Charlie Munger might see typical industry or economic growth patterns.
-11.76%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 7.03%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-2249.52%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-932.93%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
6.00%
3Y OCF/share growth of 6.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
16.65%
Net income/share CAGR of 16.65% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
-645.85%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-245.29%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
445.96%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 24.73% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
28.11%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 12.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
-0.65%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 10.23%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-91.76%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
82.29%
AR growth of 82.29% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
0.89%
Inventory growth of 0.89% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
30.20%
Asset growth of 30.20% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-8.39%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
50.09%
Debt growth of 50.09% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
435.21%
R&D growth of 435.21% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
11.64%
SG&A growth of 11.64% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.