PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.99%
Revenue growth of 5.99% vs. zero growth in Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
52.56%
Gross profit growth of 52.56% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
90.29%
Positive EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
90.29%
Positive operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
1343.52%
Positive net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
1220.00%
EPS growth of 1220.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
1240.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 1240.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.83%
Share change of 0.83% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-0.00%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-0.60%
Dividend cuts while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
13.50%
OCF growth of 13.50% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
11.76%
FCF growth of 11.76% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-62.99%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 18.88%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-62.26%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 10.32%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-48.38%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 17.02%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-373.36%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-31.73%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
37.34%
3Y OCF/share growth of 37.34% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
9.63%
Net income/share CAGR of 9.63% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
-44.38%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.66%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-87.71%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 13.83%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
25.71%
Equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Consumer Cyclical median. Mohnish Pabrai might credit disciplined reinvestment or conservative payout ratios for outperformance.
-17.40%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 12.92%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
21.45%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 13.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.32%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 9.32% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-4.88%
AR shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-27.62%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Cyclical is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-4.57%
Assets shrink while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
0.89%
BV/share growth of 0.89% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
4.18%
Debt growth of 4.18% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
47.15%
R&D growth of 47.15% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
51.97%
SG&A growth far above Consumer Cyclical median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.