PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-26.84%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.78%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-32.02%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.07%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-46.07%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-46.07%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.71%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-92.78%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-92.42%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-92.54%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.68%
Share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
0.00%
Diluted share change of 0.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
68.58%
Dividend growth of 68.58% while Consumer Cyclical median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-13.62%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-10.58%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-76.95%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 22.20%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-60.58%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 12.10%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-45.66%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 15.40%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-239.91%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
39.42%
OCF/share CAGR of 39.42% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
3.16%
3Y OCF/share growth of 3.16% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-98.14%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Consumer Cyclical median of 7.58%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
132.00%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 12.88%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
107.44%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 107.44% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
-6.40%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-18.28%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 7.51%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
0.48%
Below 50% of Consumer Cyclical median. Jim Chanos worries about inadequate short-term profitability or repeated asset impairments.
-3.24%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
20.32%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 20.32% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
86.50%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 86.50% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-29.36%
AR shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
3.59%
Inventory growth of 3.59% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-11.27%
Assets shrink while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
0.58%
BV/share growth of 0.58% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
26.20%
Debt growth of 26.20% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-29.26%
R&D dropping while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-31.82%
SG&A decline while Consumer Cyclical grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.