PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.44%
Revenue growth of 1.44% vs. zero growth in Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
1.98%
Gross profit growth of 1.98% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
-0.35%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-0.35%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
2991.74%
Positive net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
2880.00%
Positive EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
2860.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
0.27%
Share change of 0.27% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-0.00%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
100.00%
OCF growth of 100.00% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
100.00%
FCF growth of 100.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-66.05%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 19.66%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-69.39%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 13.27%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-49.38%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 10.87%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
100.00%
OCF/share CAGR of 100.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
100.00%
3Y OCF/share growth of 100.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
36.90%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 8.30% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
125.08%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 26.79%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
1534.11%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 1534.11% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
19.37%
Equity/share CAGR 75-90% of Consumer Cyclical median. John Neff would urge improved returns on retained earnings to catch up.
-6.83%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 15.97%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-3.85%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 10.59%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-100.00%
Dividend reductions while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
14.65%
AR growth of 14.65% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-19.50%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Cyclical is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
3.10%
Asset growth of 3.10% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
2.88%
BV/share growth of 2.88% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
83.53%
Debt growth of 83.53% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
18.55%
R&D growth of 18.55% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-5.63%
SG&A decline while Consumer Cyclical grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.