PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.53%
Revenue growth below 50% of 0259.HK's 9.31%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
1.47%
Cost growth less than half of 0259.HK's 13.94%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
1.99%
Positive growth while 0259.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.46%
Margin expansion while 0259.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.66%
G&A growth less than half of 0259.HK's 14.18%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
-9.37%
Marketing expense reduction while 0259.HK shows 6.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
61.13%
Other expenses change of 61.13% while 0259.HK maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
3.47%
Operating expenses growth while 0259.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.65%
Total costs growth less than half of 0259.HK's 5.08%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-1.69%
Interest expense reduction while 0259.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
31.15%
D&A growth less than half of 0259.HK's 92.67%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
8.75%
EBITDA growth while 0259.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.11%
EBITDA margin growth while 0259.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-6.80%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.26%
Other expenses reduction while 0259.HK shows 13.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-9.22%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.58%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-45.89%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
7.56%
Net income growth while 0259.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.95%
Net margin growth while 0259.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.45%
EPS growth while 0259.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.45%
Diluted EPS growth while 0259.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.52%
Share count reduction below 50% of 0259.HK's 0.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.52%
Diluted share change of 0.52% while 0259.HK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.