PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-12.49%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-13.30%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-5.93%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.50%
Margin expansion while 0259.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-10.61%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
7.55%
G&A growth while 0259.HK reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-10.14%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.59%
Operating expenses growth less than half of 0259.HK's 1587.12%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-12.02%
Total costs reduction while 0259.HK shows 27.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.44%
D&A growth 50-75% of 0259.HK's 5.76%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
-22.01%
EBITDA decline while 0259.HK shows 10.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.88%
EBITDA margin decline while 0259.HK shows 14.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.09%
Operating income decline while 0259.HK shows 14.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.25%
Operating margin decline while 0259.HK shows 18.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-151.01%
Other expenses reduction while 0259.HK shows 200.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-37.54%
Pre-tax income decline while 0259.HK shows 146.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.63%
Pre-tax margin decline while 0259.HK shows 154.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
16.77%
Tax expense growth less than half of 0259.HK's 34.55%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-46.61%
Net income decline while 0259.HK shows 127.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.98%
Net margin decline while 0259.HK shows 135.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-58.14%
EPS decline while 0259.HK shows 122.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-58.14%
Diluted EPS decline while 0259.HK shows 122.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
27.41%
Share count increase while 0259.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
27.49%
Diluted share change of 27.49% while 0259.HK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.