PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.28%
Positive growth while 0259.HK shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.76%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
8.80%
Positive growth while 0259.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
8.50%
Margin expansion while 0259.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-35.78%
R&D reduction while 0259.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-60.83%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-8.39%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.58%
Operating expenses growth less than half of 0259.HK's 1508.11%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-0.36%
Total costs reduction while 0259.HK shows 6.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.52%
D&A growth above 1.5x 0259.HK's 2.69%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
65.59%
EBITDA growth while 0259.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
65.13%
EBITDA margin growth while 0259.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
85.33%
Operating income growth while 0259.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
84.82%
Operating margin growth while 0259.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-230.78%
Other expenses reduction while 0259.HK shows 172.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
59.91%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of 0259.HK's 81.33%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
59.47%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of 0259.HK's 134.36%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
124.26%
Tax expense growth while 0259.HK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
87.44%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x 0259.HK's 75.02%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
86.92%
Net margin growth 50-75% of 0259.HK's 126.21%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
62.43%
Similar EPS growth to 0259.HK's 79.31%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
62.43%
Similar diluted EPS growth to 0259.HK's 79.31%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
15.43%
Share count increase while 0259.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.37%
Diluted share increase while 0259.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.