0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.84%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-6.21%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
17.03%
Positive growth while 0259.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
21.71%
Margin expansion while 0259.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-25.80%
R&D reduction while 0259.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
46.47%
G&A growth while 0259.HK reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-10.21%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.51%
Operating expenses growth while 0259.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.47%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-141.98%
D&A reduction while 0259.HK shows 3.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-28.65%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.80%
EBITDA margin decline while 0259.HK shows 1.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
39.17%
Operating income growth while 0259.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
44.73%
Operating margin growth while 0259.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-106.88%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
35.25%
Pre-tax income growth while 0259.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
40.66%
Pre-tax margin growth while 0259.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
138.74%
Tax expense growth while 0259.HK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.12%
Net income growth while 0259.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.60%
Net margin growth while 0259.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.73%
EPS growth while 0259.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.73%
Diluted EPS growth while 0259.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.45%
Share count reduction while 0259.HK shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.36%
Diluted share reduction while 0259.HK shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.