PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.54%
Revenue growth below 50% of 0259.HK's 19.03%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
8.45%
Cost growth less than half of 0259.HK's 19.28%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-15.02%
Gross profit decline while 0259.HK shows 17.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-19.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-36.19%
R&D reduction while 0259.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-11.15%
G&A reduction while 0259.HK shows 47.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
17.96%
Marketing expense growth 1.25-1.5x 0259.HK's 14.09%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize spending rationale.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.12%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
6.16%
Total costs growth less than half of 0259.HK's 14.80%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
177.11%
D&A growth above 1.5x 0259.HK's 6.10%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
1.76%
EBITDA growth below 50% of 0259.HK's 8.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.58%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.53%
Operating income decline while 0259.HK shows 11.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
84.75%
Other expenses growth while 0259.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-25.74%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-29.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-61.83%
Tax expense reduction while 0259.HK shows 5.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.50%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x 0259.HK's 0.36%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-2.88%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.99%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x 0259.HK's 0.39%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-4.19%
Diluted EPS decline while 0259.HK shows 0.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.44%
Share count reduction below 50% of 0259.HK's 0.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
7.00%
Diluted share change of 7.00% while 0259.HK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.