PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-13.14%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-13.06%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-13.81%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.82%
R&D reduction while 0259.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
0.82%
G&A growth less than half of 0259.HK's 28.52%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
-45.39%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.54%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-14.34%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.00%
D&A growth 1.25-1.5x 0259.HK's 9.34%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize asset base.
2.51%
EBITDA growth while 0259.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.01%
EBITDA margin growth while 0259.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.61%
Operating income growth while 0259.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.82%
Operating margin growth while 0259.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1381.20%
Other expenses growth while 0259.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
25.70%
Pre-tax income growth while 0259.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
44.71%
Pre-tax margin growth while 0259.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
121.85%
Tax expense growth while 0259.HK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
27.53%
Net income growth while 0259.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
46.82%
Net margin growth while 0259.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-44.39%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.34%
Diluted EPS growth while 0259.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
129.62%
Share count reduction below 50% of 0259.HK's 0.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
23.43%
Diluted share change of 23.43% while 0259.HK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.