0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-15.81%
Revenue decline while 0259.HK shows 16.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-15.27%
Cost reduction while 0259.HK shows 11.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-20.70%
Gross profit decline while 0259.HK shows 48.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-5.81%
Margin decline while 0259.HK shows 27.56% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-34.95%
R&D reduction while 0259.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
3.40%
G&A growth while 0259.HK reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
18.10%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x 0259.HK's 10.70%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.13%
Operating expenses growth less than half of 0259.HK's 312.47%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-13.90%
Total costs reduction while 0259.HK shows 15.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.47%
D&A growth 50-75% of 0259.HK's 5.51%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
-76.04%
EBITDA decline while 0259.HK shows 107.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-71.54%
EBITDA margin decline while 0259.HK shows 78.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-93.78%
Operating income decline while 0259.HK shows 1042.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-92.61%
Operating margin decline while 0259.HK shows 881.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.24%
Other expenses growth less than half of 0259.HK's 49.76%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-74.89%
Pre-tax income decline while 0259.HK shows 103.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-70.18%
Pre-tax margin decline while 0259.HK shows 74.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-75.17%
Tax expense reduction while 0259.HK shows 178.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-52.25%
Net income decline while 0259.HK shows 95.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-43.28%
Net margin decline while 0259.HK shows 68.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.23%
EPS decline while 0259.HK shows 95.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.99%
Diluted EPS decline while 0259.HK shows 95.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.65%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.28%
Diluted share reduction while 0259.HK shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.