0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
15.08M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
31.66%
Positive growth while 0259.HK shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
32.33%
Cost increase while 0259.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
24.43%
Positive growth while 0259.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-5.49%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
435.21%
R&D change of 435.21% while 0259.HK maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-6.77%
G&A reduction while 0259.HK shows 3.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
83.82%
Marketing expense growth while 0259.HK reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.15%
Operating expenses growth while 0259.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
34.86%
Total costs growth while 0259.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.62%
D&A growth above 1.5x 0259.HK's 0.35%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-94.56%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-95.87%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-226.33%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-195.95%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-954.72%
Other expenses reduction while 0259.HK shows 5342.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1790.26%
Pre-tax income decline while 0259.HK shows 22.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1383.83%
Pre-tax margin decline while 0259.HK shows 52.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1309.78%
Tax expense growth while 0259.HK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3875.78%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2919.79%
Net margin decline while 0259.HK shows 19.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3833.33%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3833.33%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.06%
Share count increase while 0259.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.