PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-29.45%
Revenue decline while 0259.HK shows 20.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-26.64%
Cost reduction while 0259.HK shows 13.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-61.53%
Gross profit decline while 0259.HK shows 89.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-45.48%
Margin decline while 0259.HK shows 57.87% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-37.45%
R&D reduction while 0259.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-31.14%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-37.33%
Marketing expense reduction while 0259.HK shows 3.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.63%
Operating expenses reduction while 0259.HK shows 2.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-27.96%
Total costs reduction while 0259.HK shows 12.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
333.51%
D&A growth above 1.5x 0259.HK's 2.45%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-1313.55%
EBITDA decline while 0259.HK shows 338.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1820.05%
EBITDA margin decline while 0259.HK shows 264.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-496.72%
Operating income decline while 0259.HK shows 169.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-745.78%
Operating margin decline while 0259.HK shows 157.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
38.64%
Other expenses growth less than half of 0259.HK's 94.96%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-54.36%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-118.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.19%
Tax expense reduction while 0259.HK shows 18552.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-64.24%
Net income decline while 0259.HK shows 33.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-132.78%
Net margin decline while 0259.HK shows 11.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-27.12%
EPS decline while 0259.HK shows 34.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-27.12%
Diluted EPS decline while 0259.HK shows 34.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
29.22%
Share count increase while 0259.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.28%
Diluted share increase while 0259.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.