0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-26.84%
Revenue decline while 0259.HK shows 25.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-26.16%
Cost reduction while 0259.HK shows 25.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-32.02%
Gross profit decline while 0259.HK shows 23.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-7.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-29.26%
R&D reduction while 0259.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-25.37%
G&A reduction while 0259.HK shows 5.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-40.65%
Marketing expense reduction while 0259.HK shows 31.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.02%
Operating expenses reduction while 0259.HK shows 18.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-26.69%
Total costs reduction while 0259.HK shows 24.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.64%
D&A growth less than half of 0259.HK's 76.82%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-7.20%
EBITDA decline while 0259.HK shows 12.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
26.86%
EBITDA margin growth while 0259.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-46.07%
Operating income decline while 0259.HK shows 54.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.28%
Operating margin decline while 0259.HK shows 23.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.47%
Other expenses reduction while 0259.HK shows 454.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-64.86%
Pre-tax income decline while 0259.HK shows 294.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.97%
Pre-tax margin decline while 0259.HK shows 215.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-80.57%
Tax expense reduction while 0259.HK shows 233.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-92.78%
Net income decline while 0259.HK shows 40.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-90.13%
Net margin decline while 0259.HK shows 12.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-92.42%
EPS decline while 0259.HK shows 43.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-92.54%
Diluted EPS decline while 0259.HK shows 43.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.68%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.00%
Diluted share increase while 0259.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.